We have been working very hard since 2009 to facilitate in your learning Read More. We can't keep up without your support. Donate Now.

www.bit.ly/vucodes

+ Link For Assignments, GDBs & Online Quizzes Solution

www.bit.ly/papersvu

+ Link For Past Papers, Solved MCQs, Short Notes & More

MGMT625 All Current Final Term Papers Fall 2012 (20 February to 03 March 2013) at one Place

From 20 February to 03 March 2013 Fall 2012

Current Final Term Papers Fall 2012 Papers, Feb 2013 Final Term Papers, Solved Final Term Papers, Solved Papers, Solved Past Papers, Solved MCQs

 

Please Share your Current Papers Questions/Pattern here to help each other. Thanks


+ http://bit.ly/vucodes (Link for Assignments, GDBs & Online Quizzes Solution)

+ http://bit.ly/papersvu (Link for Past Papers, Solved MCQs, Short Notes & More)

+ Click Here to Search (Looking For something at vustudents.ning.com?)

+ Click Here To Join (Our facebook study Group)


Views: 2204

Replies to This Discussion

thnx sadia for sharing pattern and questions of ur paper. I don'nt think these questions would be repeated in subsequent papers. best of luck.

plzzzz share more latest papers

may this file helps in preparations of paper.

Attachments:

sana hameed thanks for sharing 

imp

The most famous theory about manipulation of nature of people was expressed by douglas MacGreg by his theory known as “Theory X and Theory Y”. Theory X assumed the nature of average people who mostly dislike work and wish to avoid responsibility; these people must be controlled, threatened, coerce and directed. This theory also refers as Hard because this approach may produce resistance and antagonism. While Y theory refers to soft and may result in laissez-faire management.

Resistance antagonism

Antagonism

Antagonism

Laissez-faire

Laissez-faire

Laissez-fair

The role of elite is most decisive and critical in bringing change in organization. Otherwise any problem can bring deadlock or crisis like scenario in organization. In case of radical or transformational change, the dilemma gets intense. So change process of organization mostly involves around the value of powerful elites. For example international standard organization (ISO certification) unless the most powerful people at the top like owners, stakeholders or senior executive agree for the certification simple training and documentation is useless because elites have authority and Kurt Lewin termed this a driving force in qualitative implementation of change in organization.

Marvin Wiesbord’s six box model

It is diagnostic framework, mostly uses in diagnosing problems in organization since 1976 when this model published. This model is based on following critical areas:

Purposes->structures->rewards->helpful->relationship->leadership->purposes

This model is introduced to diversify the student’s mind with variety of tools for cognitive planning and systematic examining the processes and activities in organization.

Organizational climate define as people’s perception which are strongly affected by organizational conditions.

Organizational culture is meant to describe the relativity enduring set of norms and values that motivate a social system.

Garnier Model explains why and how organizations are unable to grow and in a way suggest how organization ought to grow. This model has following assumptions. First of all organizations are rigid, bureaucratic, controls centric and centralized entities. Second, organizations are unable to see their future that lies in the organization and also fail to assess their evolving states of development. Thus inability of management to understand organization development problems can result in organization becoming frozen in its present time of evolution regardless of market opportunities.

a large hierarchical level organization

When an organization go for a large in size or for empire building, it often no longer be able to serve his target customers or stakeholders but in trying to serve itself. Three major problems for such organizations are:

  1. It is an expensive option.
  2. It complicates the communication process.
  3. It complicates the control and planning systems.

Convergent period and reorientation

The model was developed by Tushman and Roamnelli who argues that organization progresses through convergent periods punctuated by reorientation which demark and set bearings for next convergent period. Convergent periods are relatively long spans of incremental change and adaptation while reorientation is relatively short periods of radical or discontinuous change. Change is generally theorized by five domains of organization activities.

  1. Culture
  2. Strategy
  3. Structure
  4. Power structure
  5. Control system

All of these domains together form strategic orientation.

Turf protection means favoritism or protection of individuals or a group or groups who have some vested interest in change process.

Turf protection means favoritism or protection of individuals or a group or groups who have vested interest in change process. For instance, protectors are those,

  1. Who are non performers
  2. May be who are most loyalist toward change initiators.

Therefore turf protection leads an organization towards in failure of change implementation. In the case of developing countries, where we have seen the most personalized management style, turf protection is common and highly lucrative.

 

Punctuated equilibrium PE model presents two approaches, incrementalism and radicalism. Features of these approaches are:

Features of incremental change

Unidirectional

Continuous

Constant learning

Relevant to all or most levels of organization

Convergent

Short time

Features of radical change

Multidirectional

Discontinuous

Periodic learning

Relevant to top levels of organization

Frame breaking

Long term

Punctuated equilibrium PE model suggest four kind of organization change

  1. Fine tuning
  2. Incremental adjustment
  3. Module transformation
  4. Corporate transformation

Fine tunings. Ongoing process of finding fit or matches between strategies, structure and people process.

Incremental adjustment…… Quinn’s model

Modular transformation…… realignment of one or more departments

Corporate transformation….. Radical shift in strategy and revised change

 

Inappropriate Innovation

Organizations are recognizing need of innovation but responding in ways that have poor strategic fit with business. Firms may take changes but they cannot support them. Adaptation is problem for such innovations.  For example the failure of EMI body scanner is attributed in part to a lack of suitable experience.

Episodic innovations.

Organizations recognizing need of innovation but on occasional basis so that intensive innovation effort is followed by a period of inactivity. Maintaining continuity and ensuring steady stream of innovations are main problem

Causes of revolutionary changes according to Dunphy are

Environmental Creep

Organizational creep

Diversification, shutdowns

Industry reorganization

Technological breakthrough

Environmental creep

Environment itself may be changing incrementally and in ways become invisible for managers. Therefore degree of change over time is long and required major readjustment.

Organizational creep

Organizations may sometimes move out of strategic alignment with the environment which remains stable.

Why was James Quinn against radical change?         

Quinn believes in planned changes and orderly transitions. He was thoroughly against radical change in strategy and in organization direction, systems or central processes. He believes that best manager is the one who moves the organization forward in small and logical steps. He thinks that incremental change increases confidence in employees and reduce organization dependence on outsiders for providing momentum for strategic change. That is why he values evolutionary rather then revolutionary and order rather than disorder.

Unilateral or traditional approach is based on action rather than of attitude. If action goes right then automatically the behavior and attitude will also go right. This approach is also sometimes called as classic school of bureaucratic approach. Unilateral approach is typical top to down management. This approach measures through outward actions and focuses on process design or redesign, restructuring of authority, communication and rules.

Sticking to one’s knitting means living around the core of the business which is definitely an area of mission statement. This balance is lost when organizations obtain some successes and see attractive alternates. At this point organizations might have a chance of deviation from its core.

Models for strategic organizational change (SOC)

Organizational development (OD) model

Behavioral modification model

Organizational development model

OD model focuses on planned and controlled change of organization in desired direction. OD attempts to change organization by changing organization’s structure, technology and people. It is based on close system and focuses on internal aspects and mostly neglects external aspect of environmental studies. For example kurt lewin’s model.

 The Behavior Modification model

BM model gives wider concept of motivation, reward, learning and organizational culture. This is an attempt to understand and reduce complex change process in the organization to an explicit rules, procedures and strategic actions to deal with all contingencies. 

 

Andrew Pettigrew defines context of change as why and when of change.

Content of change define as what of change. It is concerned with transformation.

Process is describes as how of change. It is concerned with action and interactions of various stakeholders.

Context is define as when and why of change and its component is outer context and inner context

Outer context refer to existing economic circumstances.  It also refers to social, political, economic, business and competitive environment in which firm operates. The aspects of outer context are:

  • The extent of regulation of industry
  • Ownership structure
  • Investor’s relationship with board
  • Others stakeholders

 

Inner context refers to internal influences such as structure, resources capabilities, culture and politics. It also refers to the structure corporate culture and political context within the firm. The inner context is further divided into tangibles and intangibles. Tangibles are structure and resources of organization while intangibles are organization politics and organization culture. Intangibles govern tangibles. In term of technology intangibles are software which governs hardware.

The process of change refers to the action, reaction and interaction from various interested parties when an organization seeks to move from its present state to the future state.  This may change the following aspects of organization

  • Assessment and choice of products and market
  • Objectives and assumptions
  • Evaluation criteria and fixation of target.

Change agent is an individual or a group that affects strategic change in an organization. In other words change agent is a creator of change. They may be senior executives, CEO, middle level managers and external consultants. Traditionally they are external consultants.

Another change agent is internal consultants like senior executives; they are also referring as strategic leaders who are well versed with organization’s problems and policies. The approach of strategic leaders could be legal, bureaucratic, transactional or transformational. The attributes of strategic leader are:

  • Visionary
  • True communicator        (a communication which touches heart and full of empathy and     commitment.)
  • Committed         (who stand committed and have feelings for others.)

Components of Strategy

Following are the basic components of strategy:

  • Objectives          (this may mean goals, missions, visions and targets)
  • Resources           (they may be human, informational, financial, technological etc)
  • Environment     (they may be government, customers, society, economic conditions. Environment can be friendly, hostile or neutral)
  • Time orientation             (short term or long term orientation)
  • Competitors

Types of strategic change

Adaptation

Adaptation is a change that can be accommodated within the current paradigm and occurs incrementally. This is the most common change occurring in organizations.

Reconstruction

Reconstruction is change which requires rapid change and upheaval in organization. For example an organization may make changes in structure of organization by some rapid cost-cutting programs to deal with rapidly changing market conditions.

Evolution

Evolution is a change in strategy which requires paradigm change but over time. Evolution can also explain by means of taking organization as a learning system continuously adjusting strategies with the change in environment. The only danger lies in following incremental and evolutionary change lies in experiencing strategic drift because organizations are based and bounded with existing paradigm and routines of organization.

Revolution

Revolution is a change which require rapid and major strategic and paradigm change, or where strategic drift is experiencing due to developing extreme pressure for change.

Millers and Snow research

According to Miller and Snow’s research there are four types of strategic organizations

Defenders

Prospectors

Analyzers

Reactors

Defenders

Defender organizations are those whose success comes primarily through efficiently serving to a stable market.

Prospectors

Prospector’s prime capability is that of finding and developing new product and market opportunities. For prospector organizations maintain a reputation as an inventor in product and market development is more important profitability.

Analyzers

Analyzer is an organization that attempts to minimize risk while maximizing the opportunity for profit. It combines the strength of both defenders and prospectors into a single system. Best word for analyzer’s approach is balance

Reactors

This type of organization exhibits a pattern of adjustment to its environment which is both unstable and inconsistent. This type of organization lack set of response mechanism.

Normative order

Normative orders are the ways of organizing which are defined right and proper from both members and relevant sectors of environment. 

Environment niche is different for all organizations

The environmental niche in an environment perceived by Ants is entirely different from perceived by Elephants. Minor changes in environment can affect badly while may be unnoticeable for Elephants. Similarly environmental niche for small and large organizations are subjectively different. Therefore different organizations perceive and experience the environment. Environments are not similar for all organizations.

Vital rates means death rate and founding rate of organization. This leads not only with large organization but also with small business. Important determent of organizational death and inception are:

  • Role of competition
  • Institutional constraints
  • Role of government
  • Type of product and industry becoming obsolete

Rogers define five stages of innovation

  • Need recognition
  • Research on the problem
  • Development of idea into useful form
  • Commercialization
  • Diffusion and adoption

Unprecedented novel 

thnkxxx for sharing

Ayesha, Thanks for nice effort can you please upload objective solved past paper of MGMT 625.

RSS

Looking For Something? Search Here

HELP SUPPORT

This is a member-supported website. Your contribution is greatly appreciated!

© 2020   Created by +M.Tariq Malik.   Powered by

Promote Us  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service

.