We are here with you hands in hands to facilitate your learning & don't appreciate the idea of copying or replicating solutions. Read More>>

Looking For Something at vustudents.ning.com? Click Here to Search


+ Link For Assignments, GDBs & Online Quizzes Solution


+ Link For Past Papers, Solved MCQs, Short Notes & More

Dear Students! Share your Assignments / GDBs / Quizzes files as you receive in your LMS, So it can be discussed/solved timely. Add Discussion

How to Add New Discussion in Study Group ? Step By Step Guide Click Here.

Bank Risk & Government Safety Net”


Learning objectives: This activity aims to enable the students to get an understanding about safety measures taken by Government in the country’s financial sector for a purpose of:

• Protection of investors

• Protect investors and customers from exploitations; &

• Stability of financial system


Learning outcomes: After going through this activity, the students would be able to know the tools and tactics used by Government to provide a safety net for the protection of depositors/ investors and financial system.




The State Bank of Pakistan has declared a moratorium on KASB Bank. From the last few months SBP was closely monitoring the bank's operation as it failed to meet SBP’s Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR). Presently, KASB has a capital of Rs 1.1 billion as against the target of Rs 10 billion set by the regulator for December 2014. The central bank has allowed withdrawal of up to Rs 300,000 and, is of the opinion that 92.33 percent of the depositors can continue to operate their accounts. This is the first time that SBP has taken such a step. Previously, SBP used to remove the Board of Directors, appoint an Administrator and nominate a big, solid commercial bank to run the banking operations of a troubled bank. It appears that SBP is convinced that the management of the bank is professional and sound and it is the failure of bank's shareholders who have failed to bring in additional capital and maintain the Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) as required by the regulator under its prudential regulations. The law does empower the Banking Regulator (SBP) to take all necessary steps to protect the interests of creditors i.e. the depositors in a bank. This is not the first time and may not be the last, when SBP is required to step in and protect depositors' savings. However, SBP also needs to cater to systemic risks in the financial system. KASB Bank's deposits may be miniscule (0.6 percent) of the total banking deposits. However, the nervousness caused to depositors would be much more. Depositors in other banks that have threshold lower than Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR), desired by SBP or are on a weaker footing may face a rush in withdrawal of large deposits; thus compounding their problem. So the challenge for SBP to maintain stability in the financial/banking system may be bigger than anticipated at present. In addition, since there is no limit on borrowers who now shall be tempted to borrow to the limit from a weak bank may be another problem. SBP is lender of the last resort So what else could SBP do when despite repeated reminders to sponsors/shareholders of KASB Bank to increase the capital did not materialize. Banking is a difficult business; but no financial business is easy either. If profits are large so are the losses - shareholders have 8 to 10 rupees as capital and 92 rupees or more belong to the depositors. This is precisely the reason why the role of a regulator is so important and all-pervasive in banking. In addition, banks unlike other businesses can leverage much more. Country's constitution and the law empowers the SBP to regulate the monetary and credit system of Pakistan and foster its growth in the best national interest with a view to securing monetary stability and fuller utilization of the country's productive resources. We hope and pray it continues to do so. So far, no depositor has ever lost any savings when a bank has folded. These simpletons know despite the fact that private banks do not carry any deposit insurance. There have been delays but all depositors including big corporations have got their money back. The fact that no liquidator or administrator has been appointed proves that SBP has faith in the present management in KASB Bank and it is also a testament that shareholders have erected a Chinese wall between the directors and management. The rising of non-performing loans in the bank are the real cause of the loss, which has climbed to Rs 6 billion on a deposit base of Rs 15 billion. This was precisely the reason the present sponsors had floated the idea of breaking KASB Bank into good and bad banks and selling the good bank free from Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) with losses to a profitable bank, which could avail the losses against its profits to lower the tax liability of the acquiring bank. Unfortunately, however, there were no takers of the idea or were not in the knowledge of SBP as it took this unprecedented step on Friday.




 1.      Why there was a need to suspend KASB bank operations against the claim: protection of depositors’ interest? Discuss the risk being faced by the bank.


2.      Does a trade-off really exist between providing protection and depositors’ trust?


3.      If not suspended by SBP, how does a KASB bank ltd. may lead to financial contagion? 


(Support your answers with logical reasoning) Note: Complete your comment within 400 words


Important Instructions:


1. Your discussion must be based on logical facts.

2. The discussion board will remain open for 3 working days.

3. Do not copy or exchange your answer with other students. Two identical / copied comments will be marked Zero (0) and may damage your grade in the course.

4. Obnoxious or ignoble answer should be strictly avoided.

5. Questions / queries related to the content of the discussion board, which may be posted by the students on MDB or via e-mail, will not be replied till the due date of discussion board is over.


For detailed instructions please see the discussion board announcement

+ How to Follow the New Added Discussions at Your Mail Address?

+ How to Join Subject Study Groups & Get Helping Material?

+ How to become Top Reputation, Angels, Intellectual, Featured Members & Moderators?

+ VU Students Reserves The Right to Delete Your Profile, If?

See Your Saved Posts Timeline

Views: 775


+ http://bit.ly/vucodes (Link for Assignments, GDBs & Online Quizzes Solution)

+ http://bit.ly/papersvu (Link for Past Papers, Solved MCQs, Short Notes & More)

+ Click Here to Search (Looking For something at vustudents.ning.com?)

+ Click Here To Join (Our facebook study Group)

Replies to This Discussion


      Answer no 3

Because it’s the responsibility of state bank of Pakistan to protect the financial system of the country. After analyzing the whole situation SBP realize the KSAB have no chance to betterment and if it taking loan continue then its create more loss for depositor, SBP and financial system of country so SBP order to suspend its claim,.

I think the situation in which sponsor of the bank suggest to break the bank and sale its parts, it clearly show the KSAB go to default and solvency.


i hope its helpfull for you :)

koi Idea ni mil raha......:-(

the time is going towards at 12.00 O'Clock.

ill send the answer but make changes to it

  1. 1.          Why there was a need to suspend KASB bank operations against the claim: protection of depositors’ interest? Discuss the risk being faced by the bank?


          The KASB bank operations needed to be suspended because they didn’t have sufficient deposits to meet the requirements of the borrowers and creditor’s. According to the report the bank’s deposits are (0.6) of the total banks deposits. Another reason was that shareholders failed to bring in additional amount of capital and maintain the minimum capital requirement according to the prudential regulations. The rising of non-performing loans in the bank are the real cause of the loss, which has climbed to Rs 6 billion on a deposit base of Rs 15 billion. If the operation were not suspended then the borrowers would have rushed to the banks for their money that had been deposited in the banks and that would have created a panic in the banking sector.


2.      Does a trade-off really exist between providing protection and depositors’ trust?

        It depends on the situation and the current condition but i think trade-off provide protection and depositors in the following conditions

1) Bank failure.

2) Deposit insurance.

3) Failed bank resolution.


 During the 1980s and 1990s the banks were in failures and most of their problem was resolved with the help of the trade- off. It also helped in handling the liquidity risks in the past.



   If not suspended by SBP, how does a KASB bank ltd. may lead to financial contagion

Contagion is a disease that does not affect a single bank but it also creates negative impacts over other banks and the economy of the country. I think it will create the following hurdles in the functioning of KASB bank.

1)      Depositors will rush to the bank to withdraw the deposits.

2)      With less capital, KASB bank will be forced to contract the balance sheet making fewer loans.

3)      It will start to lose its customers.

4)      False rumors that a bank is insolvent can lead to a run which renders it illiquid.

Such a run on a KASB bank can cause it to fail.

any idea about GDB plzzzzzzzzz

Basically this gdb is to help us analyze the financial problem that a bank can face or u can say risks

Please more discuss


© 2020   Created by +M.Tariq Malik.   Powered by

Promote Us  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service